INTRODUCTION
Based on both Wokeism’s ‘Lived Experience’ doctrine and its ‘Oppression Matrix’ doctrine, this religiopolitical cult has created a literal gender mill. This gender mill incorporates global and ancient superstitions, mental disorders and you name it, and it is pumping out a seemingly ever-expanding number of gender identities. These identities range from including autism as an aspect of gender to superstitious “two spirit” genders, and they just get more and more ridiculous by the day. At present there are approximately 100 gender identities for sale. Here are just a few of my favourites:
‘XENOGENDER’
‘Xenogender’ can be defined as a gender identity that references "ideas and identities outside of gender. "This may include descriptions of gender identity in terms of "their first name or as a real or imaginary animal" or "texture, size, shape, light, sound, or other sensory characteristics."
‘ACAULT’
‘Acault is a gender from Buddhist people of Myanmar. It describes people who are AMAB (assigned male at birth) who have been possessed by a female spirit god named Manguedon who has imparted femininity on them. Acaults are often seen as wise shamans and seers.’
‘Maverique is a non-binary gender that is completely different from male, female, neutral, and everything that comes with it. However, maverique is anything but genderless.
The gender maverique is a distinct gender (it is not an umbrella term because it is an aporagender) that is defined by the following characteristics:
– Having nothing to do with being a man, woman, or neutral, or any gender that is among these or shares anything of them. It also has nothing to do with masculinity, femininity, or neutrality.
– Being on the outside of the gender spectrum. (*They are definitely on some kind of spectrum!)
– The difference between maveriques and neutral gender is that maveriques don’t have a passive or neutral perspective regarding their gender(s).’
‘The conscious effort to subvert traditional notions of gender identity and gender roles.’
‘Aliagendered people are neither male, female, or agendered. They are people who experience a gender identity that does not fit on the masculine-feminine spectrum but nonetheless feel a gendered identity.’
‘Two-Spirit Female is a term used to describe a Native American gender identity. Two-Spirit people are those who have both male and female spirits, and are often seen as having special powers as a result. It explains gender non-conformity in spiritual terms, seeing the person as having a spirit that spans traditional gender constructs.’
‘Some autistic people embrace the label to express that their gender identity—usually, something other than cisgender—is related to their autism.’
INTERSECTIONAL FEMINISM AND WOKEISM
The ever-expanding incorporation of non-gender identity markers now increasingly tied to gender is the result of intersectional feminism’s influence over Wokeism. Intersectional feminism may be defined in the following words:
Intersectional feminism considers the intersecting social structures of gender, race, social class, sexual orientation, religion, ability, and age, among others, as interrelated and shaping one another.
In their paper From intersectionality to interference: Feminist onto-epistemological reflections on the politics of representation, Evelien Geerts and Iris van der Tuin describe ‘intersectionality:’
‘Intersectionality’ – or the idea that subjects are situated in frameworks of multiple, interacting forms of oppression and privilege through socially constructed categories such as gender and ‘race’/ethnicity – has become a central paradigm in feminist theory (see e.g., Cho et al., 2013, Franken et al., 2009, Lutz et al., 2011, Oleksy, 2011). It is seen as “the most important theoretical contribution that women's studies, in conjunction with related fields, has made so far” (McCall, 2005: 1771…)
In attempting to counter the previously hegemonic interpretation of an overly generic “lived experience of the woman,” intersectional feminism has advanced an irrational application of ‘Identity Politics’ mixed with the ‘Oppression Matrix,’ which have become two central doctrines of Wokeism, to create a slightly less myopic view of an individual woman’s lived experience and added other identity markers in a bid to better explain the experiences of women-categories.
It is, essentially, a fuzzy area of academia with no real empirical evidentiary substance, but for largely the unreliable anecdotal accounts of women who share overlapping identity markers, and from there it has taken a giant and unsupported leap in logic to posit that it can isolate reliable qualitative data across ultimately diverse groups of individuals. This shaky area of social science, which is far more social than science, has made its way into the religion of Wokeism and is now believed as gospel truth by the Woke, many of whom have no academic training to understand and interpret this sociological hypothesis in its proper multi-dimensional academic context.
CONCLUSION
Ayaan Hirsi Ali recently mockingly asked, “If we have 100 genders, why not 1000?” I will see Ayaan’s 1000 genders and raise her 7.888 billion, because the fact is, no two people on earth experience life and society the same way with respect to any characteristic’s relationship to society, therefore logic dictates that this ever-expanding gender mill incorporate the unique lived experiences of each individual on the planet, which at the moment stands at approximately 7.888 billion.
This infinite expansion of gender identities only works if gender is completely stripped of its socially prescribing function which has always been, and still predominantly is, tied to biological sex. Wokeism’s ambition to make gender little more than a purely subjective feeling, rather than have society as an overarching organizational structure prescribe it, opens the door to an even more insane level of inclusion than the Woke seem to have considered. In freeing gender identity from the chains of organized social structures, this doctrine of ‘Infinite Gender Identity Expansion’ taken to its logical conclusion loses all meaning and any analytical value, and thus we are left with 7.888 billion gender identities, the current number of human beings held hostage on this insane space-rock hurtling through the universe.